Not too long ago, I started looking at PCs that would serve as a web-server for the FM-DX Webserver. My local Czech market was not particularly filled with good options, especially since we don’t have huge marketplaces available locally. I scouted through marketplaces from other countries such as Aliexpress and eBay; however, I couldn’t find anything cheap shipped within Europe.
As a last resort, I decided to visit the Polish marketplace Allegro. Nevertheless, I was positively surprised. I checked the cheapest Mini PCs, and what caught my eye in particular was the Fujitsu S520 thin client at a very good price tag of 56 zł, which equals roughly to 13€. This offer, in particular, also included the original power supply and an extra mouse, which was a nice addition.
Specifications:
| CPU | AMD GX-212ZC |
| GPU | Radeon R1E |
| RAM | 4GB DDR3 |
| SSD | 4GB NAND |
My experience:
Storage:
Let’s address my first caveat with this machine: the SSD. This one is only 4 GB and lacks an expansion slot such as SATA or another PCI-E slot, posing a significant limitation. However, for my particular usage, it seems to be sufficient. I have installed Debian testing on this machine along with Node.js, ffmpeg, and a few other libraries to run my webserver. I ended up running without swap, as I’m not using any DE, and after installing all the packages, I ended up with about 1.2 GB of free space. The RAM usage floated comfortably at around 300MB, which is incredibly low, so I am comfortable leaving the swap disabled.
I have noticed a Mini PCIe port, but it is most likely only compatible with Wi-Fi cards, as it has been mentioned in other articles on the internet that mSATA SSDs aren’t compatible.
IO:
I was pleasantly surprised to find that there are 4 audio ports in total. Therefore, without an external sound card, I should be able to connect 2 line-in devices without any issues. This is perfect, as the hardware should handle 2 instances of the server without any problems.
Compute power:
Surprisingly, the server handled audio streaming for 80 clients, including serving dynamic web content, without breaking a sweat. Based on this performance, I estimate it could easily accommodate 300-400 clients before maxing out the processor.
Server load with 81 clients:
| System Idle | 0-1% |
| Server running (empty) | 25% on both cores |
| Server running (80 clients) | 41% on both cores |
One unit will be deployed in Slovakia in the future, utilizing Power over Ethernet (PoE). The compatibility with a standard DC jack and the ability to use a 19-20V adapter were pleasant surprises. Along with that, here’s the power draw directly from the wall:
| System Idle | 4W |
| Running the webserver + TEF6686 via USB | 8W |
In conclusion, considering the price of three units of this terminal without shipping, one could only purchase a single used Raspberry Pi 3 in the Czech market. For me, this was a clear choice. This price is also the regular price, for which these units are available on different markets.
Pros:
- Price: Unbeatable at 13€ per unit.
- Low power consumption: Peaks at 10W under load.
- Presence of a standard DC jack.
- Line-in audio port.
- 2x USB3 ports.
- Upgradable RAM (up to 4GB).
- Passive cooling ensures silent operation.
- Compact size: Comparable to an Intel NUC.
Cons:
- Lack of SATA port limits storage expansion options to external drives.
- Absence of HDMI port necessitates DVI-HDMI conversion.
- 4GB SSD may be insufficient for some users, although it sufficed for my needs.
Additionally, I received my order from Poland within 48 hours, impeccably packaged. Shipping costs amounted to approximately 20 PLN (4.6 €), and the package arrived conveniently at a local box, so I could pick it up right away.
Summary:
In the end, I am satisfied with my choice. However, if you are looking for a Mini PC that you could use as a home server, I would recommend looking elsewhere. Fujitsu S920 might be a good start at a reasonable price point for you. Other than that, if you are looking for a PC that would run a singular app that is not resource heavy, look no further than the S520, which will satisfy your needs.
Pretty great post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have really loved browsing your weblog posts. After all I’ll be subscribing on your feed and I hope you write once more very soon!
If some one desires expert view concerning blogging afterward i advise him/her to pay a visit this weblog, Keep up the good work.
It’s actually very complex in this busy life to listen news on TV, so I just use world wide web for that reason, and get the newest news.
I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!
Thanks for your posting on this site. From my personal experience, periodically softening upwards a photograph could provide the wedding photographer with a little an creative flare. Many times however, that soft clouds isn’t exactly what you had as the primary goal and can frequently spoil an otherwise good picture, especially if you intend on enlarging this.
It’s in point of fact a great and useful piece of info.I am glad that you just shared this useful info with us.Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.